Biographie
最短で確実に合格！ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor試験問題
さらに、It-Passports ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditorダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CgaSMr-uYPsXtujXR4FtZOejQnrsRl1a
It-PassportsのPECBのISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor試験トレーニング資料は君の成功に導く鍵で、君のIT業種での発展にも助けられます。長年の努力を通じて、It-PassportsのPECBのISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor認定試験の合格率が１００パーセントになっていました。もしうちの学習教材を購入した後、認定試験に不合格になる場合は、全額返金することを保証いたします。
認定試験では、情報セキュリティ管理の原則と概念、ISO/IEC 27001標準、監査手法と原則、監査人の役割と責任など、さまざまなトピックをカバーしています。候補者は、複数選択の質問、ケーススタディ、および実際の演習の組み合わせを通じて、知識とスキルを実証する必要があります。試験が正常に完了すると、候補者はPECB認定ISO/IEC 27001リード監査人認定を受け取ります。これは、情報セキュリティ管理の卓越性と専門知識のマークとしてグローバルに認識されます。
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor試験は、情報セキュリティ管理の分野でキャリアアップを望む個人にとって最適です。試験は、情報セキュリティ管理システム、リスク管理、監査プロセスなど、幅広いトピックをカバーします。試験に合格することで、個人が監査チームをリードし、組織の情報セキュリティ管理システムを評価するために必要なスキルと知識を持っていることが証明されます。
>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditorクラムメディア <<
認定するISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor｜素晴らしいISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditorクラムメディア試験｜試験の準備方法PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam最速合格
何事でもはじめが一番難しいです。PECBのISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor試験への復習に悩んでいますか。弊社の試験のためのソフトを買うのはあなたの必要の第一歩です。弊社の提供したのはあなたがほしいのだけではなく、試験のためにあなたの必要があるのです。あなたは決められないかもしれませんが、PECBのISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditorのデモをダウンロードしてください。やってみて第一歩を進める勇気があります。
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR試験は、主要な監査での2年間の経験を含む、情報セキュリティ管理と監査で最低5年間の専門的経験を持つ専門家を対象としています。また、ISMSの管理と実装を担当する専門家や、情報セキュリティ管理と監査のキャリアを追求したい人にもお勧めします。この認定は世界的に認識されており、IT、財務、ヘルスケア、政府など、さまざまな業界の専門家に新しい機会を開くことができます。
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam 認定 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 試験問題 (Q359-Q364):
質問 # 359
You are preparing the audit findings. Select two options that are correct.
- A. There is a nonconformity (NC). Based on sampling interview results, none of the interviewees were able to describe the incident management procedure reporting process including the role and responsibilities of personnel. This is not conforming with clause 9.1 and control A.5.24.
- B. There is no nonconformance. The information security handling training has performed, and its effectiveness was evaluated. This conforms with clause 7.2 and control A.6.3.
- C. There is an opportunity for improvement (OFI). The iLiirmation security incident training effectiveness can be improved. This is relevant to clause 7.2 and control A.6.3.
- D. There is no nonconformance. The information security weaknesses, events, and incidents are reported.
This conforms with clause 9.1 and control A.5.24.
- E. There is a nonconformity (NC). The information security incident training has failed. This is not conforming with clause 7.2 and control A.6.3.
- F. There is an opportunity for improvement (OFI). The information security weaknesses, events, and madents are reported. This is relevant to clause 9.1 and control A.5.24.
正解：A、C
解説：
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 7.2 requires an organization to determine the necessary competence of persons doing work under its control that affects its ISMS performance, and to provide training or take other actions to acquire or maintain the necessary competence1. Control A.6.3 requires an organization to ensure that all employees and contractors are aware of information security threats and concerns, their responsibilities and liabilities, and are equipped to support organizational policies and procedures in this respect2. Therefore, if an ISMS auditor finds that the information security incident training effectiveness can be improved, this indicates an opportunity for improvement (OFI) that is relevant to clause 7.2 and control A.6.3.
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 9.1 requires an organization to monitor, measure, analyze and evaluate its ISMS performance and effectiveness1. Control A.5.24 requires an organization to define and apply procedures for reporting information security events and weaknesses2. Therefore, if an ISMS auditor finds that based on sampling interview results, none of the interviewees were able to describe the incident management procedure reporting process including the role and responsibilities of personnel, this indicates a nonconformity (NC) that is not conforming with clause 9.1 and control A.5.24.
The other options are not correct options for preparing the audit findings based on the given information. For example, there is no nonconformance if the information security weaknesses, events, and incidents are reported, as this conforms with clause 9.1 and control A.5.24; there is no nonconformance if the information security handling training has performed, and its effectiveness was evaluated, as this conforms with clause 7.2 and control A.6.3; there is no nonconformity if the information security incident training has failed, as this may not necessarily indicate a lack of conformity with clause 7.2 or control A.6.3; there is no opportunity for improvement if the information security weaknesses, events, and incidents are reported, as this is already conforming with clause 9.1 and control A.5.24. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO/IEC 27002:2013 - Information technology - Security techniques - Code of practice for information security controls
質問 # 360
Which one of the following options best describes the main purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit?
- A. To prepare an independent audit report
- B. To learn about the organisation's procurement
- C. To check for legal compliance by the organisation
- D. To get to know the organisation's customers
- E. To determine redness for a stage 2 audit
- F. To introduce the audit team to the client
正解：E
解説：
The main purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit is to determine readiness for a Stage 2 audit. A Stage 1 audit is a preliminary assessment that evaluates the organization's ISMS documentation, scope, context, and objectives, and identifies any major gaps or nonconformities that need to be addressed before the Stage 2 audit. A Stage 1 audit does not introduce the audit team to the client, as this is done during the audit planning phase. A Stage 1 audit does not check for legal compliance by the organization, as this is done during the Stage 2 audit. A Stage 1 audit does not prepare an independent audit report, as this is done after the Stage 2 audit. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 70. : ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB, page 23.
質問 # 361
What is the relationship between data and information?
- A. Information is the meaning and value assigned to a collection of data.
- B. Data is structured information.
正解：A
解説：
The relationship between data and information is that information is the meaning and value assigned to a collection of data. Data is a set of facts, figures, symbols or characters that can be processed by a computer or other means. Data by itself has no inherent meaning or context. Information is data that has been processed, organized, interpreted or presented in a way that makes it useful or meaningful for a specific purpose or audience. Information can be used to convey knowledge, support decision making or communicate messages. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 defines data as "representation of facts, concepts or instructions in a formalized manner suitable for communication, interpretation or processing by humans or by automatic means" (see clause 3.12) and information as "meaningful data" (see clause 3.25). Reference: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course], ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is Data and Information?
質問 # 362
After completing Stage 1 and in preparation for a Stage 2 initial certification audit, the auditee informs the audit team leader that they wish to extend the audit scope to include two additional sites that have recently been acquired by the organisation.
Considering this information, what action would you expect the audit team leader to take?
- A. Arrange to complete a remote Stage 1 audit of the two sites using a video conferencing platform
- B. Increase the length of the Stage 2 audit to include the extra sites
- C. Inform the auditee that the request can be accepted but a full Stage 1 audit must be repeated
- D. Obtain information about the additional sites to inform the certification body
正解：D
解説：
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, a certification body should establish criteria for determining audit time and audit team composition based on factors such as the scope of certification, size and complexity of the organization, risks associated with its activities, etc2. Therefore, if an auditee requests to extend the audit scope to include two additional sites after completing Stage 1 of an initial certification audit, the audit team leader should obtain information about the additional sites to inform the certification body, so that they can review and approve the change in scope and adjust the audit time and audit team accordingly2. The other options are not appropriate actions for the audit team leader to take in this situation. For example, increasing the length of the Stage 2 audit to include the extra sites without informing the certification body may violate their procedures and policies; arranging to complete a remote Stage 1 audit of the two sites using a video conferencing platform may not be feasible or effective depending on the nature and location of the sites; and informing the auditee that the request can be accepted but a full Stage 1 audit must be repeated may not be necessary or reasonable if there are no significant changes in the auditee's ISMS since Stage 12. References: ISO/IEC
17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements
質問 # 363
Scenario 5: Data Grid Inc. is a well-known company that delivers security services across the entire information technology infrastructure. It provides cybersecurity software, including endpoint security, firewalls, and antivirus software. For two decades, Data Grid Inc. has helped various companies secure their networks through advanced products and services. Having achieved reputation in the information and network security field, Data Grid Inc. decided to obtain the ISO/IEC 27001 certification to better secure its internal and customer assets and gain competitive advantage.
Data Grid Inc. appointed the audit team, who agreed on the terms of the audit mandate. In addition, Data Grid Inc. defined the audit scope, specified the audit criteria, and proposed to close the audit within five days. The audit team rejected Data Grid Inc.'s proposal to conduct the audit within five days, since the company has a large number of employees and complex processes. Data Grid Inc. insisted that they have planned to complete the audit within five days, so both parties agreed upon conducting the audit within the defined duration. The audit team followed a risk-based auditing approach.
To gain an overview of the main business processes and controls, the audit team accessed process descriptions and organizational charts. They were unable to perform a deeper analysis of the IT risks and controls because their access to the IT infrastructure and applications was restricted. However, the audit team stated that the risk that a significant defect could occur to Data Grid Inc.'s ISMS was low since most of the company's processes were automated. They therefore evaluated that the ISMS, as a whole, conforms to the standard requirements by asking the representatives of Data Grid Inc. the following questions:
*How are responsibilities for IT and IT controls defined and assigned?
*How does Data Grid Inc. assess whether the controls have achieved the desired results?
*What controls does Data Grid Inc. have in place to protect the operating environment and data from malicious software?
*Are firewall-related controls implemented?
Data Grid Inc.'s representatives provided sufficient and appropriate evidence to address all these questions.
The audit team leader drafted the audit conclusions and reported them to Data Grid Inc.'s top management.
Though Data Grid Inc. was recommended for certification by the auditors, misunderstandings were raised between Data Grid Inc. and the certification body in regards to audit objectives. Data Grid Inc. stated that even though the audit objectives included the identification of areas for potential improvement, the audit team did not provide such information.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Based on scenario 5, the audit team assessed the ISMS as a whole, rather than assessing the effectiveness and conformity of each process. Is this acceptable?
- A. Yes, due to time constraints for the audit completion, the audit team must obtain absolute assurance by assessing the ISMS as a whole
- B. No, the audit team should obtain assurance that the ISMS conforms to the standard requirements by assessing each process
- C. Yes, if the audit team has obtained a reasonable assurance that helps them evaluate the ISMS conformity
正解：C
解説：
Yes, assessing the ISMS as a whole can be acceptable if the audit team obtains reasonable assurance that the system conforms to the standard requirements. The approach taken by the audit team must still ensure that all significant aspects of the ISMS are evaluated adequately, and if this is achieved through a holistic assessment, it is considered sufficient.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems
質問 # 364
......
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor最速合格: https://www.it-passports.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor.html
P.S. It-PassportsがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditorダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CgaSMr-uYPsXtujXR4FtZOejQnrsRl1a
